Streszczenie<\/h3>\n
What happens if we reconsider the word use of christianitas<\/em> in Carolingian times without presuming in advance that it became a generally accepted concept of Christendom. What can we learn about a society by studying the semantic structures of its remaining textual witnesses? These questions are in the center of a recently published PhD dissertation that retraces in a semasiological approach the word use of this term that shaped our understanding of the Middle Ages for so long. It is surprising that the only monograph about christianitas<\/em> before was presented by Jean Rupp in 1939. Since then, Medievalists build upon Rupp\u2019s thesis that the concept came up in Carolingian times and grew so important that for the time of Innocent III it seems justified to call the medieval Christian society christianitas<\/em> despite the well-known polysemy of that term. This paper now will provide an insight into different situations of word use for the 8th<\/sup> and 9th<\/sup> century in order to show that at least for the time of Charlemagne attempts of imposing such a concept had to fail.<\/p>\n Instytut J\u0119zyka Polskiego PAN<\/a><\/p>\nPrelegent<\/h3>\n
Dr Tim Geelhaar<\/h4>\n
Miejsce<\/h4>\n
Nagranie spotkania<\/h4>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/scriptores.pl\/hortus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2018\/03\/MNISW-300x78.jpg\")
<\/a><\/i>Hortus Deliciarum. Wok\u00f3\u0142 \u015bredniowiecznego tekstu (cykl seminari\u00f3w i publikacja elektroniczna) – zadanie finansowane w ramach umowy 644\/P-DUN\/2016 ze \u015brodk\u00f3w Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wy\u017cszego przeznaczonych na dzia\u0142alno\u015b\u0107 upowszechniaj\u0105c\u0105 nauk\u0119<\/i><\/p>\n